01
Crawl access and status codes
We check whether important URLs can be reached, whether internal links are crawlable, and whether the server returns the correct status.
Klarai services
Technical SEO Audit Service That Turns Issues Into a Fix Plan
Your site can look fine and still be difficult for Google to crawl, render, or index. We find the technical problems that matter, prove which ones are real, and turn them into a fix plan your team can act on.
TL;DR
Start with a free automated scan when you need a quick first view. Choose a consultant-led technical SEO audit when crawl, indexation, rendering, migration or performance issues need manual investigation. Every important finding should include evidence, affected URLs, likely impact, a recommended fix, an owner, and a validation test. A long export from an audit tool is not a strategy.
Problem
The problem, and how we solve it
Technical SEO issues often hide beneath a site that looks normal to users. Content may keep improving while the pages that should bring leads are blocked by crawl controls, weak internal links, broken redirects, conflicting canonicals, JavaScript rendering issues, or slow templates.
A scanner can flag hundreds of possible issues in seconds. The useful work is deciding which warnings are genuine, which pages they affect, whether they create a meaningful risk, and what should be fixed first.
Klarai reviews how search engines discover, access, render, understand and index the site. The output is not a tool dump. It is a prioritised issue register with evidence, owners, recommended fixes and validation steps.
Definition
What is a technical SEO audit service?
A technical SEO audit service reviews the systems beneath the copy: status codes, crawl controls, canonical signals, internal links, JavaScript rendering, sitemaps, page performance, structured data and measurement. The goal is to prove what is blocking visibility and define the cleanest fix.
- Crawl access, status codes and blocked resources
- Indexation, canonical signals and duplicate URLs
- JavaScript rendering, server HTML and metadata
- Core Web Vitals, structured data and analytics gaps
What’s included
What the Klarai technical SEO audit covers
02
Indexation and canonical signals
We compare the pages you want indexed with the pages search engines appear to select, then look for conflicting signals.
03
JavaScript rendering and server HTML
For Next.js and other JavaScript websites, we compare the initial response with the rendered page.
04
Sitemaps and robots controls
We check whether sitemaps contain canonical, indexable URLs and whether robots rules match the intended crawl policy.
05
Architecture and internal links
We review depth, orphaned pages, repeated navigation, contextual links, breadcrumbs and page importance.
06
Performance and structured data
We review slow templates, layout instability, delayed interaction and markup that does not match the visible page.
Fit
When you need this
Use this audit when search traffic dropped after a redesign, important pages are not indexed, rankings stalled despite stronger content, a JavaScript site shows different content to crawlers, a migration is approaching, or reports show many errors but nobody knows what matters.
What you receive
You receive an executive summary, a technical issue register, affected URL samples, evidence and reproduction steps, priority scoring, recommended fixes, suggested owners, validation tests, a review call, and an optional implementation scope.
The honest promise: you will understand which technical problems are verified, which pages they affect, what to fix first, and how to confirm the work was completed correctly.
Our process
How the audit works
Scope and access
We define the website areas, templates, markets, recent changes and known concerns.
Crawl and evidence collection
We collect technical signals from the live site, search data, analytics, performance tools and platform settings.
Manual verification
Important warnings are reproduced and checked so false positives are removed.
Prioritisation and fix notes
Each verified issue receives a priority, owner, recommendation and validation step.
Walkthrough
Your team gets the reasoning, tradeoffs and recommended order of work.
Fix validation
After implementation, affected templates and URL samples are checked again.
Engagement
Audit only or audit with implementation
Choose an audit only when your internal team has the time and technical ability to apply the fixes. Choose implementation support when the problem crosses SEO and development, the team lacks capacity, or release validation matters. Diagnosis and development are related, but they remain separate deliverables.
Frequently asked questions
What is included in a technical SEO audit service?+
A useful service reviews crawl access, indexation, status codes, canonicals, rendering, sitemaps, robots controls, architecture, internal links, performance, structured data and measurement.
What is the difference between a free scan and a manual audit?+
A free scan detects common signals quickly. A manual audit investigates context, verifies important warnings, connects them to affected pages, and prioritises fixes around business impact.
What access do you need?+
Access depends on the problem. A deeper audit may use Search Console, analytics, CMS access, performance data and technical documentation.
Will Klarai fix the problems it finds?+
Implementation support can be scoped for approved fixes. The audit separates diagnosis from development so ownership, cost and validation remain clear.
Can you audit a Next.js or JavaScript website?+
Yes. The review can cover rendered HTML, routing, metadata, status codes, canonicals, internal links, sitemaps, hydration behaviour and public/private route boundaries.
Can a technical audit guarantee higher rankings?+
No. It can remove verified technical barriers and improve the foundation, but it cannot control competitors, search systems, authority or content quality.
Next step
Find the problems worth fixing first
Run the free audit for a quick first view. If the results point to a deeper crawl, indexation, rendering or migration problem, book a technical review.